<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia: Challenging Scientific Rigor Since 2007</title>
	<link>http://blog.benjaminfenster.com/2008/03/17/wikipedia-challenging-scientific-rigor-since-2007/</link>
	<description>A Blog of Musings and Mockery</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: just pixels</title>
		<link>http://blog.benjaminfenster.com/2008/03/17/wikipedia-challenging-scientific-rigor-since-2007/#comment-93</link>
		<author>just pixels</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.benjaminfenster.com/2008/03/17/wikipedia-challenging-scientific-rigor-since-2007/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Agreed this is a shocking lapse in Wikipedia.  Just because something can't be seen, is transferred based on saying the word "cooties", is cured by punching the arm of the transmitter, and only affects human children age 8-15, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Just read "DaVinci's Other Code" for the truth about cooties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed this is a shocking lapse in Wikipedia.  Just because something can&#8217;t be seen, is transferred based on saying the word &#8220;cooties&#8221;, is cured by punching the arm of the transmitter, and only affects human children age 8-15, doesn&#8217;t mean it doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>Just read &#8220;DaVinci&#8217;s Other Code&#8221; for the truth about cooties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
